very good
good
not so good
not good
bad
very well
well
not so well
not well at all
worst possible
best possible
security (general)
the palestinian issue, occupied territories
the uprising in the occupied territories (intifada)
fighting terror, security forces
israeli arabs
foreign policy (general)
the peace (solving the israeli arab conflict)
economy (general)
inflation
depression, unemployment
internal affairs (general)
social gap
young couples, housing
education
health
transportation, road accidents
immigration absorption
religious affairs, religious-secular relations
unity and moral of the people
other
hatehiya
tsomet
moledet(gandi)
kah(kahana)
tnu'at hamerkaz-shinui
mapam
ratz
mafdal
meimad(the centre religious party)
agudat israel\degel hatora
shas\yeshi
pagi-morasha(the united torah camp)
arab democratic party(daraushe)
hadash(rakah)
the progressive list
other party
no opinion
all parties together
conceding territories in return for peace
annexation of territories
leave current situation unchanged
return most of judea,samaria and gaza
annexation of judea,samaria and gaza
no concession
concession of a small part
concession of a part
almost full concession
concession of all judea and samaria for peace treaty
yes
no
definitely
probably
probably not
definitely not
full civil rights(incl. suffrage)
civil rights (excluding suffrage)
decrease current rights
too harsh
appropriate
too permissive
take all measures towards peace treaty
increase military power
strongly agree
agree
disagree
strongly disagree
definitely possible
possible
impossible
definitely impossible
definitely capable
capable
incapable
definitely incapable
most likely
likely
unlikely
most unlikely
syria
plo
jordan
lebanese shiites
libya
egypt
iraq
iran
saudi arabia
definitely believe
believe
disbelieve
definitely disbelieve
partial return of territories
full return of territories
total takeover of israel
total takeover of israel and termination of major part of je
primary preference over all other issues
security must not be reached at any price
preference for security interests
preference for rule of law
contribute to national security
neither contribute nor disrupt
disrupt national security
negative effect
neither positive nor negative
positive effect
strongly support
support
disaprove
strongly disaprove
mandatory support
generally, support
generally, not support
never mandatory to support
substantial weakening
certain weakening
no change
certain strengthening
substantial strengthening
hawk
dove
more ready for concessions
less ready for concessions
improved
did not change
became worse
likud's camp's chances improved
ma'arah's camp's chances improved
religious parties' chances improved
increased
decreased
strong inclination to vote for likud
strong inclination to vote for labor
strong inclination to vote for religious parties
more positive
more negative
significant effect
certain effect
small effect
no effect at all
ma'arah
tehiya
meimad(the central religious party)
agudat israel\degel hatorah
pagi(the united torah camp)
the arab democratic party(daraushe)
do not know
very big difference
big difference
some difference
small difference
hardly any difference
everyone's views are similar
great part's views are similar
small part's views are similar
no one's views are similar
ignorant of relatives' views
almost every day
once or twice a week
infrequently
not at all
father
mother
brother\sister
spouse
children
both of the parents equally
all the family members equally
no one
definitely capitalist
more capitalist than socialist
more socialist than capitalist
definitely socialist
definitely all right
all right
not that good
definitely not good
minor effect
labor(ma'arah)
labor (ma'arah)
ma'arah's team
likud's team
both equally
none of them
definitely yes
probably yes
probably no
definitely no
yes, if headed by likud party
yes, if headed by labor party
often
sometimes
seldom
never
to a great extent
to a certain extent
to a small extent
none
identification with party
party's candidate for prime minister
party's policies on certain issues
party being in government or in opposition
neturei kartha
rakah(hadash)
kah(rabbi kahana movement)
agudat israel-pagi
progressive movement towards peace
other plo supporting groups(e.g. 'bnei hakfar')
moledet (gandi movement)
arab democratic party (daraushe movement)
matzpen
yesh gvul' movement
definitely agree
not certain
definitely disagree
definitely agrees
agrees
disagrees
definitely approve
approve
disapprove
definitely disapprove
suits labor
suits likud
neither
1 strong aversion
10 strong affection
right
left
maybe
maybe not
very high
high
moderate
low
hardly any
definitely go on with present system
probably go on with present system
probably shift to partly constitutional
definitely shift to partly constitutional
both systems are no good and shift to fully constitutional s
meimad(centrist religious party)
pagi(united torah camp)
progressive list for peace
blank note
did not decide yet
no intention to vote
agudat israel
shas
morasha
tami
yahad(weizman)
shinui
hatehiya+tsomet
lova eliav
ometz(horovitz)
did not vote despite having suffrage
did not vote due to absence of suffrage
did not decide who to vote for
died,lives abroad,no suffrage
not married
married
divorced
widowed
minority
majority
approve change in status
disapprove change in status
there are conditions when usage is justified
under no conditions is usage justified
fair
unfair
jewish majority state
greater israel
democratic state (equal rights for all)
state of peace (low probability of war)
observe all religious laws to the letter
observe most of religious laws
observe some of religious laws
do not observe at all, totally free
ashkenazi
sephardic
both
north america
asia
eastern europe
western or central europe
america,australia,south-africa
israeli born(father also)
israeli born(father in north america)
israeli born(father in asia)
israeli born(father in eastern europe)
israeli born(father in western or central europe)
israeli born(father in america, australia or south africa)
israeli born
before 1948
1948-1954
1955-1960
1961-1966
1967-1972
1973-1977
1978-1983
1984+
favor but not member
member but no position
member and position but no compensation
member and position with compensation
moderate left
center
moderate right
religious trend
do not identify with any
almost never
rarely
approximately once a week
twice-thrice a week
one daily newspaper almost every day
more than one daily newspaper almost every day
not served yet but will in future
conscription
serving in regular service
served in idf in past
did not serve in idf
middle-high
middle
workers' status
do not belong to any status
well above average
somewhat above average
as average
somewhat below average
well below average
salaried worker
salaried clerk
salaried manager
independent\small business
independent-company owner
not working
female
male
real panel
would be panel unmatched
panel with changes on questionnaire
not panel
missing info
almost empty
repeats